Tuesday, November 24, 2015

Metabolite Profiling: More Than Just Detective Work

By Jim Schmidt
Sr. Scientific Advisor
ABC Laboratories
www.abclabs.com
Time flies!  It’s been just over a year since my first posts on this blog. One of my early posts, back in September 2014, concerned a chapter on metabolite profiling I was writing for a forthcoming book of invited essays.  I submitted the chapter in late spring of this year and the book - New Horizons in Predictive Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics (published by the Royal Society of Chemistry), with about two dozen contributors – is set to be released in just a few weeks.

I performed metabolite profiling of one kind or another for most of my nearly thirty-year career at the bench; even though I’m not in the lab, presently, it’s still a passion and interest, and with good reason: metabolite profiling is a very intellectually satisfying exercise, owing in no small part to its interdisciplinary nature. The “detective work” of metabolite profiling contributes to medicinal chemistry, enzymology, pharmacology, toxicology, mechanistic chemistry, analytical chemistry, and many other fields. Among the more satisfying and exciting results of metabolite profiling is the discovery of novel and/or unexpected metabolites.
Apart from the satisfying “detective work,” there are some other very important and practical reasons for performing metabolite profiling early and often, including but not limited to:
Drug Attrition - The most practical reason for pursuing metabolite profiling efforts as early and as diligently as possible is to mitigate attrition in the drug discovery process. Owing in no small part to an increased focus on metabolite profiling in drug design, attrition attributed to poor pharmacokinetic  (PK) behavior decreased from 40% in the early 1990s to <10% in 2000 (in one recent study, poor PK behavior represented as little as 3% of drug failures in preclinical evaluation). In fact, metabolite profiling can support troubleshooting of other aspects of drug attrition and should not be limited simply to improving PK behavior.
The Law - The aphorism applied to highway speed limits and (cheekily) applied to gravity—“It’s Not Just a Good Idea. It’s the Law”—can also be applied to metabolite profiling. Guidance documents, including—but not limited to—those from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA)/ICH, have formalized the regulatory framework and decision-making of metabolite profiling.
Due Diligence - Another important rationale is the due diligence process that is associated with the process of acquisition of intellectual property and/or drug portfolios. While limited funding may result in a temptation to delay or minimize metabolite profiling efforts, that temptation should be ignored: scientific due diligence is every bit as essential as financial analysis and important questions about metabolites and pathways help minimize poor choices in investment decisions; likewise, groups should be prepared to answer these questions to improve chances for desired investment.
Stay tuned to this blog for more thoughts on metabolite profiling.
What are you doing to pay more (and earlier) attention to metabolites in the drug discovery and development process?

Thursday, November 19, 2015

Download ABC's 3 Presentations from AAPS 2015



Below are recent presentations by ABC at this year's AAPS in October.

Don’t Leave Method Transfers to Chance

When planning your development strategy, you probably didn’t give much thought to method transfers. But when an analytical method doesn’t perform as expected, it can take precious days of investigative work to find the problem, and even more to resolve it. Learn about common pitfalls that cause method transfer failures, how to decide what type of method transfer makes sense for your study, and how to implement a fail-safe communication plan that will help put your outsourcing relationship on the right course.

To download this presentation, click here.

 


The Critical Role of CMC in your IND Submission

Early stage drug developers generally have their sights firmly set on the initiation of clinical trials, focusing on toxicological and pharmacological studies. Often, the importance of Chemistry, Manufacturing and Control (CMC) data is underestimated. But the CMC package is critical to IND approval, and meeting all FDA requirements demands careful planning and sound execution. This discussion will cover the risk/reward criteria for determining the level and degree of method validation, reference standard characterization and formulation; as well as potential pitfalls and ways to streamline the entire development process.

To download this presentation, click here.




Are Extractables & Leachables Going Phase-Appropriate?

Not long ago, it was more or less conventional wisdom that E&L studies should be performed late in the development cycle—even after the final container/closure system is known. But current regulatory trends suggest that, like many things GxP, expectations for early E&L data are on the rise. In recent years, many drug sponsors have been required to address E&L questions as early as phase I/II. It isn’t just CTM containers causing concern; questions often involve the equipment used in manufacturing and dosing devices. Phase-appropriate E&L program design can help you avoid related clinical holds and unplanned expense.

To download this presentation, click here.